<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/10668659?origin\x3dhttp://organizedindividualists.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

You don't need 10 megapixels

Trying to explain to my non-geek friends why more megapixels doesn't always mean better image quality is an ongoing frustration for me.

Fortunately, there's this website to help show the way.

It's simple: More pixels on a smaller chip = Less data per sensor = Higher probability of errors = More noise = Uglier photos.

“You don't need 10 megapixels”