<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/10668659?origin\x3dhttp://organizedindividualists.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Why more women aren't "geeks"

C|Net looks at why more women aren't "geeks".

I'm not sure if a) that's a bad thing and b) more math and science is the right cure. It won't change (at least here) until there's a shift in what society says women should be. Maybe we need to come out with Madame Curie Barbie or something.

(Though the thought of a Madame Curie Bratz doll fills me with glee. :-) )

“Why more women aren't "geeks"”